everystack-reviewer

To validate build output against acceptance criteria, you can use an automated code review process that evaluates build diffs and interface contracts, producing a pass/fail verdict without modifying files.

A quality gate for build verification evaluates code changes against predefined acceptance criteria, naming conventions in GLOSSARY.md, and project rules in CLAUDE.md to ensure builds meet standards before merging.

Checking naming compliance against GLOSSARY.md involves reviewing build diffs to verify that identifiers and terms adhere to project-specific naming conventions, returning a pass or fail decision for the build.

Yes, you can verify interface contracts from a subdivision doc through a read-only build diff evaluation, ensuring code changes comply with the defined interfaces and outputting a verdict without altering any files.

Automated code review supports checking compliance with project-specific rules, including CockroachDB safeguards and tenant isolation, by auditing the build diff against the playbook's defined acceptance criteria.

The best way to enforce a pass/fail quality gate before merging is to automatically audit code diffs against functional requirements and project standards, ensuring consistency and preventing bugs without manual intervention.