Evidence Accumulation Model Selector

Select evidence-accumulation models for choice-response time data.

34|5|Updated Feb 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/HaoxuanLiTHUAI/awesome_cognitive_and_neuroscience_skills --skill evidence-accumulation-model-selector
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: Evidence Accumulation Model Selector
Source: https://github.com/HaoxuanLiTHUAI/awesome_cognitive_and_neuroscience_skills/tree/main/skills/evidence-accumulation-selector
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/HaoxuanLiTHUAI/awesome_cognitive_and_neuroscience_skills --skill evidence-accumulation-model-selector

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Analyzing choice-response time data often requires selecting among competing evidence accumulation models (DDM, LBA, EZ-diffusion, and racing diffusion). This skill guides researchers in choosing the appropriate model based on experimental design and data properties.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Model guidance: recommends when to use full DDM, EZ-diffusion, LBA, or race models depending on trial counts and bias considerations.
  • Planning protocol: provides a structured decision framework for planning model fitting, evaluation, and parameter recovery checks.
  • Use Case: when you have multi-alternative RT data with distributional information, this skill helps you select the suitable model and evaluation approach.

Quick Start

Run the Evidence Accumulation Model Selector on your choice-RT dataset to determine the appropriate model.

Frequently Asked Questions about Evidence Accumulation Model Selector

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I choose between DDM, LBA, and EZ-diffusion for choice response time data?

Choosing an evidence accumulation model depends on trial counts and bias considerations. Use EZ-diffusion for low trial counts, full DDM for complete RT distributions with accuracy data, and LBA or race models for multi-alternative experimental designs.

When do I need an evidence accumulation model for analyzing RT distributions?

You need an evidence accumulation model when analyzing choice-response time data from experiments with multiple response options. These models decompose full RT distributions and accuracy data to estimate underlying cognitive decision-making parameters.

What trial count is required to fit a full DDM or LBA model?

Fitting a full DDM or LBA model requires sufficient trial counts per condition to ensure reliable parameter estimation. You also need access to full RT distributions and accuracy data, plus familiarity with evaluation metrics like WAIC, BIC, or Bayes factors.

How do I evaluate and compare evidence accumulation model fits?

To evaluate and compare evidence accumulation model fits, use model-fitting evaluation metrics such as WAIC, BIC, and Bayes factors. This structured decision framework also guides parameter recovery checks during the model selection process.

When should I not use the full DDM for choice RT analysis?

You should not use the full DDM when your experimental design involves multiple response options better suited to LBA or race models, or when low trial counts per condition necessitate the simpler EZ-diffusion approach.