evidence-auditor

Gap analysis in academic writing identifies evidentiary gaps by cross-referencing assertions against manuscript content. It pinpoints specific areas where evidence is missing, weak, or improperly cited, flagging unsupported statements for revision.

To perform claim verification on a manuscript, input clear claims and manuscript context to generate a report on missing or weak evidence. This workflow applies to academic peer review and manuscript self-correction by systematically checking if assertions are backed by solid results.

Yes, you can use this evidence audit skill for manuscript self-correction. It applies to self-correction workflows by systematically checking if every assertion is backed by solid experimental results, theoretical arguments, or appropriate citations, flagging any unsupported statements.

No, claim verification requires clear input of claims and manuscript context to generate a report on missing or weak evidence. Without providing the manuscript content, the skill cannot cross-reference assertions or identify evidentiary gaps.

The limitation of evidence audit for research integrity is that it only identifies missing or weak evidence based on provided manuscript content. It requires clear input of claims and context, meaning it cannot evaluate external data or sources not present in the input.