evidence-check

Verify references and citations by checking link accessibility and source consistency.

1|Updated Feb 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/dobachi/claude-skills-marketplace --skill evidence-check-dobachi
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: evidence-check
Source: https://github.com/dobachi/claude-skills-marketplace/tree/main/plugins/evidence-check/skills/evidence-check
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/dobachi/claude-skills-marketplace --skill evidence-check-dobachi

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

It helps you ensure that claims in reports and papers are supported by real, accessible sources, and that citation content and usage are consistent with the cited material.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Reference existence verification: Checks whether URL links and cited items actually exist and attempts retrieval via multiple access methods and fallbacks (e.g., URL variations, Archive.org snapshots, DOI redirects).
  • Citation-to-content consistency: Confirms that cited numerical and factual information matches what appears in the original source and flags discrepancies.
  • Contextual appropriateness review: Assesses whether the citation fits the surrounding claim, including detecting misleading or over-generalized citations.
  • Correction and reporting workflow: Suggests fixes for auto-fixable issues, requests human review when content is AI-inaccessible or requires confirmation, and re-checks after changes.
  • Use case: Before submitting a paper or sharing a report, you can validate that every link and in-text citation backs the stated facts and data.

Quick Start

Use the evidence-check skill to verify all links and citations in your draft and return a structured report of no issues, auto-fixable problems, and items needing human review.

Frequently Asked Questions about evidence-check

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify citations and check if reference links are accessible in academic papers?

Citation verification checks link accessibility and matches citation claims to source content using multi-stage access attempts like URL variations, Archive.org snapshots, and DOI redirects to validate references in academic writing.

What is the best way to audit references and ensure source consistency in research reports?

Reference auditing assesses contextual appropriateness and confirms cited numerical and factual information matches original sources, flagging discrepancies and misleading or over-generalized citations in evidence-driven documentation.

How do I validate footnotes and bracketed citations against their cited material before submitting a paper?

Validating bracketed citations and footnotes requires matching in-text claims to original source content, evaluating contextual fit, and running consistency checks for numbers and facts to ensure citations back stated data.

Can I automatically fix broken links and incorrect citations found during reference verification?

Reference verification includes a correction and reporting workflow that suggests fixes for auto-fixable issues, requests human review when content is AI-inaccessible, and re-checks after changes are applied.

Does citation verification handle inaccessible URLs and dead links in academic writing?

Citation verification handles inaccessible URLs by attempting retrieval via multiple access methods and fallbacks including URL variations, Archive.org snapshots, and DOI redirects before requesting human review for inaccessible content.

When should I request human review during a reference auditing workflow?

Reference auditing requests human review when cited content is AI-inaccessible, requires confirmation of numerical or factual accuracy, or when contextual appropriateness cannot be automatically validated against the original source.