evidence-discipline

Classify factual claims and enforce citation discipline in consulting research outputs.

Updated Feb 19, 2026

Search Tags:#research #citations #evidence #consulting #source validation #fact checking

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/abhishek2chikun/consulting_agents --skill evidence-discipline-abhishek2chikun

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: evidence-discipline
Source: https://github.com/abhishek2chikun/consulting_agents/tree/main/backend/app/skills/evidence-discipline
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/abhishek2chikun/consulting_agents --skill evidence-discipline-abhishek2chikun

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill prevents unsupported claims, fabricated citations, and weak evidence from undermining consulting research by enforcing traceable reasoning and reliable sourcing practices.

Core Features & Use Cases

Claim Validation: Classifies factual statements, assumptions, inferences, and quantitative claims to determine appropriate evidence requirements.
Source Discipline: Guides the use of primary sources, secondary sources, search results, and retrieved documents while preserving attribution.
Use Case: Apply this Skill when creating market analyses, competitor research, strategic recommendations, or reports that require defensible evidence trails.

Quick Start

Use the evidence-discipline skill to review my consulting report and identify unsupported claims, weak sources, and missing citations.

Frequently Asked Questions about evidence-discipline

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I add source validation and fact checking to my consulting research?▼

Source validation for consulting research is achieved by enforcing traceable reasoning, classifying claims, and preserving attribution to ensure all factual assertions are backed by reliable sources.

How do I check my market analysis report for unsupported claims and weak citations?▼

You can review a market analysis report by classifying factual statements and quantitative claims to identify missing citations, weak sources, and unsupported assertions that require defensible evidence trails.

What is the best way to preserve attribution when using retrieved documents for research synthesis?▼

Preserving attribution during research synthesis requires guiding the use of primary sources, secondary sources, and search results while maintaining traceable links from quantitative assertions back to their original documents.

Can I use evidence discipline to validate factual statements in competitor analysis?▼

Yes, you can validate factual statements in competitor analysis by applying claim classification to determine appropriate evidence requirements and ensuring material assertions have traceable sources.

Does evidence discipline work with RAG-based document synthesis scenarios?▼

Yes, evidence discipline applies to RAG-based document synthesis scenarios by validating retrieved documents, enforcing source discipline, and preventing fabricated citations from undermining the generated research outputs.