evidence-evaluator-skill

Evaluate information source credibility using the CRAAP test and evidence hierarchies.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/swarochish/indian-law-plugin --skill evidence-evaluator-skill
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: evidence-evaluator-skill
Source: https://github.com/swarochish/indian-law-plugin/tree/main/skills/evidence-evaluator-skill
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/swarochish/indian-law-plugin --skill evidence-evaluator-skill

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps users critically evaluate the reliability and quality of information sources, ensuring they rely on credible evidence.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • CRAAP Test Application: Systematically assesses sources based on Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose.
  • Evidence Hierarchy Ranking: Ranks different types of evidence from strongest (systematic reviews) to weakest (anecdotes).
  • Study Quality Assessment: Evaluates the methodological rigor of research studies.
  • Use Case: A student researching a sensitive topic can use this Skill to determine if a blog post or a peer-reviewed journal article is a more trustworthy source of information.

Quick Start

Evaluate the credibility of the provided article using the CRAAP test and evidence hierarchy.

Frequently Asked Questions about evidence-evaluator-skill

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate the credibility of a research source?

Source credibility is evaluated by applying the CRAAP test to check Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose, alongside ranking the information using an evidence hierarchy from systematic reviews to anecdotes.

What is the CRAAP test for information quality?

The CRAAP test is a systematic criteria set for information quality that evaluates sources based on Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose to determine overall reliability and credibility.

How do I rank evidence strength for academic research?

Rank evidence strength by applying an evidence hierarchy that orders information types from strongest systematic reviews to weakest anecdotes, ensuring reliance on methodologically rigorous research studies.

Can I assess the methodological rigor of a study using the CRAAP test?

Yes, you can assess study quality by applying the CRAAP test criteria and evidence hierarchies to evaluate the methodological rigor, accuracy, and overall credibility of research studies.

Does evidence hierarchy work for critical analysis of news?

Evidence hierarchy works for news analysis by systematically evaluating source credibility and information quality, allowing you to distinguish between peer-reviewed evidence and weaker anecdotal reports.

When should I not use the CRAAP test for source evaluation?

The CRAAP test is less suitable when you need to evaluate purely subjective creative works rather than objective information sources, as it is designed for assessing factual evidence quality and research credibility.