evidence-gathering

To curate sources for a literature review, provide a topic or URL list to trigger a six-step workflow that validates documentary sources, applies explicit credibility criteria, and outputs a structured evidence catalog.

Gathering evidence from URLs involves a staged human-in-the-loop process that collects documentary sources, performs representativeness checks with an equity lens, and formats them into a machine-readable output for evidence synthesis.

Yes, you can use this source curation workflow for policy and social impact research, as it is specifically designed to gather and validate documentary sources across governance, policy, and social impact domains.

The equity lens works by enforcing representational gap analysis and equity considerations during the staged human-in-the-loop checks, ensuring the validated source catalog addresses representativeness across collected documentary sources.

You should expect a machine-readable output format from the evidence-gathering workflow, structured as a ready-to-hand-off evidence catalog that includes validated sources and representativeness checks for the evidence-synthesis module.