evidence-gating

To evaluate if your research is ready to advance, review your current literature, claims, and artifacts against stage gate criteria. This assessment returns a readiness decision and lists the minimum missing evidence required to pass the stage gate.

Evidence gating is a research stage gate check that evaluates literature, claims, and artifacts to determine readiness for progression. It returns a clear pass, pass with caveats, or fail decision and identifies the minimum missing evidence required to pass.

To identify missing evidence needed to pass a stage gate, evaluate your current artifacts and unresolved objections against governance criteria. This evaluation returns a structured list specifying the minimum missing evidence required to pass and advance to the next stage.

Yes, you can apply orchestrator checks to enforce stage gates and governance across unresolved objections. The evaluation assesses these objections alongside claims and artifacts to return a clear decision and list the minimum missing evidence needed to pass.

Yes, it works for multi-stage research cycles by evaluating whether the current evidence base supports advancing from analysis to proposal. It reviews your project state and returns a readiness decision with any required gaps to pass the stage gate.