What problem does it solve? Sokrates reports churn, file age, and contributor counts as static numbers, but those numbers cannot explain how a codebase got to its current state. This Skill reads the git history behind a Sokrates analysis and turns it into a verifiable story: development eras, growth origins, shifting areas of activity, contributor arrivals and departures, rewrites and abandoned code, and where the project is heading. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Deterministic timeline digest: A bundled Python script parses git-history.txt and git-commits.txt into periods, focus-shift tables, people statistics, and lifecycle data, so no trend is derived by hand. - Structured findings across six groups: Eras, growth, focus-shift, people, lifecycle, and trajectory, each with stable IDs so re-runs and diffs stay consistent. - Evidence-based narration: Every claim is backed by citable commit messages, changelogs, or current files, with severity calibrated to what a trend costs if ignored. - Use Case: A tech lead inherits a five-year-old repository and asks "how did this codebase get here and is it stagnating?" The scan produces era chapters, a velocity trend with 90-day comparisons, and flags risks like a stalled migration or a departed core owner. ## Quick Start Run the evolution scan on this repository's _sokrates analysis and tell me the story of how the codebase evolved and where it is heading.