executing-plans

Executing a development plan with review checkpoints involves loading a written implementation plan, performing critical pre-implementation validation, and processing tasks in an auditable sequence that stops for clarification when blockers arise.

Structured plan execution workflow enforces end-to-end coordination by loading implementation plans, applying critical review checkpoints, integrating with git-worktrees, and tracking status across in-progress and completed stages.

To handle blockers and plan gaps during implementation execution, the workflow stops automatically and seeks clarification, ensuring tasks remain in a controlled and auditable sequence without proceeding blindly.

Yes, plan execution integrates with git-worktrees and finishing-a-development-branch capabilities, enforcing end-to-end coordination and guaranteeing clean development processes throughout the workflow.

Yes, a written implementation plan is required before execution because the workflow loads the plan file to perform critical pre-implementation validation and process tasks in a controlled, auditable sequence.

Limitations of automated plan execution include stopping and requiring manual clarification when blockers arise or plan gaps are detected, preventing continuous unattended runs in ambiguous development environments.