executing-plans

Plan execution with checkpoints prevents scope creep by managing context per task and enforcing explicit verification before proceeding. Deviation handling requires an approval flow to safely adjust the plan when tasks diverge from the original steps.

Plan execution with checkpoints prevents scope creep by managing context per task and enforcing explicit verification before proceeding. Deviation handling requires an approval flow to safely adjust the plan when tasks diverge from the original steps.

Atomic commits during plan execution occur only after a task passes its verification step and satisfies defined done criteria. This ensures each committed change is traceable to a specific, verified task within the formal implementation plan.

You handle deviations during plan execution by triggering a deviation protocol that pauses progress and initiates an approval flow. This ensures any adjustments to the original implementation plan are reviewed and applied safely before continuing.

The best way to prevent scope creep during plan execution is to use checkpoints and fresh context management for each task. This confines actions strictly to the current task's requirements and blocks progress until explicit verifications pass.

Yes, you need a detailed plan before starting task-by-task execution because the process relies on a formal plan to drive per-task actions, verify steps, done criteria, and atomic commits. Without a plan, there is no baseline for deviation handling.