executing-plans

Execute implementation plans in controlled batches with review checkpoints. Load the plan, perform critical review, execute tasks in batches (default first 3), and gather feedback between batches to catch errors early and stay aligned with architectural goals.

Batch-driven execution with architect and code review gates ensures regular checkpoints. After each batch, generate progress reports showing what was implemented and verification output, allowing human partners to review, provide feedback, and adjust direction before the next batch.

Orchestrate tasks through batch execution with built-in review gates. Apply pre-implementation checks, use TDD-based implementation, verify each task, and generate batch-level reports. This systematic approach manages complexity and maintains quality across large implementation efforts.

Yes. Batch execution with architect and code review checkpoints embeds human oversight into the workflow. Execute tasks in controlled groups, report results after each batch, and pause for feedback before proceeding, balancing automation efficiency with collaborative review.

Perform a critical plan review to identify concerns and raise questions before execution begins. Pre-implementation checks validate the plan's feasibility, ensuring alignment with project goals and reducing rework from undetected issues.

Without checkpoints, errors accumulate undetected and become expensive to fix later, causing rework. Regular batch review gates catch misalignments early, allowing architectural course correction and preventing downstream cascading failures.