One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/duany049/multi-skill-orchestration --skill exp-eval
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: exp-eval
Source: https://github.com/duany049/multi-skill-orchestration/tree/main/.claude/skills/exp-eval
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/duany049/multi-skill-orchestration --skill exp-eval

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It turns completed experiment results into an evidence-based verdict that updates the linked idea’s lifecycle status and records why it succeeded or failed.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Cross-model adjudication: Uses an impartial Review LLM to evaluate support vs refutation, then Claude synthesizes a final conservative outcome.
  • Automated wiki updates: Writes changes to the linked idea page (status, failure_reason, date_resolved) and fills the experiment page’s “Idea updates” section.
  • Graph evidence tracking: Adds supports or invalidates edges (experiment → idea) and rebuilds derived graph artifacts (context brief and open questions).
  • Best-practice safety constraints: Refuses to run unless the experiment is marked completed and requires linked_idea to be present.

Quick Start

Use exp-eval to evaluate the completed experiment 'exp-slug-123' and update the linked idea with a single verdict: run exp-eval with argument-hint input 'exp-slug-123' and include --auto to apply wiki changes without pausing.

Frequently Asked Questions about exp-eval

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I evaluate completed wiki experiments and update linked research idea status?

Evaluate completed wiki experiments by converting outcomes into support or failure verdicts for linked research ideas. The process reads experiment metrics and key results, invokes an impartial Review LLM, synthesizes a final outcome, and writes idea status transitions plus failure reasons directly to wiki pages.

How does cross-model adjudication work for experiment evaluation?

Cross-model adjudication for experiment evaluation uses an impartial Review LLM to assess support versus refutation, then Claude synthesizes a final conservative outcome. This dual-model approach ensures rigorous evidence aggregation before updating the linked idea's lifecycle status.

Can I aggregate sibling experiment evidence for a single research idea verdict?

Yes, you can aggregate sibling experiment evidence for a single research idea verdict. The evaluation process considers sibling experiments as aggregate evidence, applying their metrics and key results to determine a comprehensive support or failure outcome for the linked idea.

What prerequisites are required to run experiment evaluation on wiki pages?

Experiment evaluation requires the wiki experiment to be marked as completed and a linked_idea field must be present. The evaluation refuses to run unless these safety constraints are met, ensuring only finished experiments with proper idea linkages are processed.

How do I automatically apply wiki updates after experiment evaluation?

Automatically apply wiki updates after experiment evaluation by running the evaluation with the auto flag enabled. This writes changes to the linked idea page including status, failure reason, and date resolved, while adding supports or invalidates graph edges without pausing for confirmation.

What graph artifacts are rebuilt during experiment evaluation?

During experiment evaluation, graph artifacts rebuilt include supports or invalidates edges connecting experiment to idea, plus reconstructed context brief and open questions. These derived graph artifacts ensure the research knowledge base reflects the new evidence-based verdict.