What problem does it solve?
This Skill reduces the risk of publishing invalid or misleading experimental results by detecting common integrity failures like fake ground truth, self-referential score normalization, phantom/mismatched result claims, and scope overreach.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Cross-model integrity review: The executor gathers only file paths while a separate reviewer model reads everything to judge integrity patterns without the executor participating in verdicts.
- Integrity checks for fraud and failure modes: Verifies ground-truth provenance, score normalization methodology, existence/consistency of claimed results, dead-code/unused metric functions, and whether evaluation scope matches how the paper describes it.
- Advisory integration output: Writes both a human-readable report and a machine-readable JSON summary, enabling downstream pipeline steps to tag claims with integrity status.
Quick Start
Use the experiment-audit skill with your experiment directory or results path to generate EXPERIMENT_AUDIT.md and EXPERIMENT_AUDIT.json for an integrity verdict.