expert-consult

Multi-expert panel consultation is a process that dispatches 2–4 consult-capable agents in parallel to analyze cross-cutting architecture and strategy questions. It classifies applicable expert lenses, evaluates trade-offs concurrently, and produces a structured synthesis that preserves genuine disagreements to guide decision-making.

To analyze architecture trade-offs, you ask a question spanning multiple domains and the system dispatches 2–4 expert agents in parallel. Each agent operates with explicit panel context, evaluating the design from its specific lens before a structured synthesis highlights both agreement and divergence to prompt your final decision.

Yes, expert consultation explicitly preserves disagreement during strategy synthesis. It produces a structured summary that highlights where experts agree and where they diverge, explaining why tensions exist so you can understand the trade-offs rather than receiving a single averaged recommendation.

You can use parallel reasoning for open-ended product strategy questions where different schools of thought optimize for different priorities. The system applies a soft cap of 4 agents to keep cost and relevance aligned, confirming with you before exceeding this scope.

The main limitation is scope control, managed by a soft cap of 4 parallel agents to prevent excessive cost and maintain relevance. It is not suited for questions requiring a single definitive answer, as the mechanism is designed to preserve tension and prompt user decision-making rather than resolve disagreement automatically.