external-consensus

Synthesize three agent debate reports into an implementation plan using Codex or Claude Opus.

1|2|Updated Sep 17, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/MAdrid1011/Zircon-VLIW --skill external-consensus-madrid1011
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: external-consensus
Source: https://github.com/MAdrid1011/Zircon-VLIW/tree/main/.claude/skills/external-consensus
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/MAdrid1011/Zircon-VLIW --skill external-consensus-madrid1011

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires codex, claude, and includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This skill synthesizes a balanced, implementation-grade plan from three agent debate reports using an external AI reviewer (Codex or Claude Opus).

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Combine three perspectives into a single, clear debate-derived consensus plan.
  • Prefer Codex for deep reasoning with web research; Claude Opus is available as a fallback.
  • Output a structured implementation plan ready for review and GitHub issue creation.

Quick Start

Invoke the external-consensus script with three agent reports to generate a consensus plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about external-consensus

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I synthesize a consensus plan from multi-agent debate reports?

Synthesize a consensus plan from multi-agent debate reports by combining bold, critique, and reducer perspectives into a single actionable implementation file. An external AI reviewer processes the three agent reports to produce a structured, ready-to-use plan.

What is multi-agent consensus planning and when do I need it?

Multi-agent consensus planning is the process of merging conflicting AI debate outputs into an implementation-grade plan. You need it when a multi-agent workflow produces divergent bold, critique, and reducer reports that require external review to resolve.

Does external-consensus support Claude Opus or do I need Codex?

External-consensus supports both Claude Opus and Codex. It prefers Codex for deep reasoning with web research capabilities, but Claude Opus is available as a fallback to synthesize the debate reports into a final plan.

How do I generate an implementation plan from three different AI perspectives?

Generate an implementation plan from three AI perspectives by invoking the external-consensus script with the bold, critique, and reducer agent reports. The external reviewer combines these views to output a concrete consensus file ready for GitHub issue creation.

What are the limitations of using an external AI reviewer for multi-agent debate synthesis?

A limitation of using an external AI reviewer for multi-agent debate synthesis is the strict dependency on three distinct agent debate reports. Without the bold, critique, and reducer perspectives as input, the script cannot produce an implementation-grade consensus plan.