faculty-meeting

To get multi-perspective research advice, you can convene a panel of diverse research advisors to analyze your research question, generating authentic perspectives and a structured synthesis that highlights agreements, divergences, and new research questions.

Yes, you can manually select specific academic advisors using the `--with` flag. Otherwise, the system auto-selects 3–5 contrasting expert personas by analyzing your question and scoring candidates from the catalog.

Multi-perspective panel analysis applies to academic, business, and policy research contexts. It uses multiple theoretical traditions to enrich problem framing and design across these diverse domains.

The best way to surface theoretical conflicts is through a faculty-meeting style deliberation. This approach brings together diverse advisors to highlight productive tensions and acknowledge blind spots in your research framing.

The structured synthesis summarizes divergent research perspectives by identifying agreements, conflicts, and new research questions. It produces each advisor’s analysis in their own authentic voice and suggests actionable next steps.

No, you do not need external tools to generate multi-perspective research analysis. The system selects personas from the catalog, generates perspectives, and produces a structured synthesis entirely without external dependencies.