fail-standby

Configure fail-timeouts and standby paths within the Fallback harness.

Updated May 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/AesopScott/mojo --skill fail-standby
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: fail-standby
Source: https://github.com/AesopScott/mojo/tree/main/harnesses/skills/fail-standby
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/AesopScott/mojo --skill fail-standby

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses performance bottlenecks and recovery delays in the Fallback harness by implementing strict fail-timeouts and pre-warmed standby paths.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Performance Tuning: Reduces latency and friction by optimizing how the system handles failed model paths.
  • Reliability Engineering: Ensures blocked routes recover quickly through pre-warmed standby configurations.
  • Use Case: When a specific API route experiences repeated timeouts, use this Skill to define a tighter fail-timeout and activate a standby path to maintain throughput.

Quick Start

Use the fail-standby skill to inspect the current Fallback harness configuration and propose a tighter timeout rule to reduce latency.

Frequently Asked Questions about fail-standby

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I reduce API latency when a fallback route experiences repeated timeouts?

To reduce API latency during repeated timeouts, define a tighter fail-timeout within the Fallback harness. This optimizes system recovery by immediately switching to a pre-warmed standby path to maintain throughput.

What is a fail-timeout and how does pre-warming a standby path improve system reliability?

A fail-timeout caps the wait duration before abandoning a blocked route, while a pre-warmed standby path initializes backup resources beforehand. Together they ensure blocked routes recover quickly and maintain stable system operation.

How do I configure fail-timeouts and standby paths for performance-critical routing?

Inspect the current Fallback harness configuration to propose tighter timeout rules. You must define precise failure modes and verify boundary conditions to ensure stable operation under latency and throughput constraints.

Do I need to define specific failure modes before optimizing system recovery behavior?

Yes, optimizing system recovery requires precise definition of failure modes. You must also verify boundary conditions to ensure stable system operation when applying fail-timeouts and standby paths to error-handling workflows.

What are the limitations of using tighter fail-timeouts for error-handling workflows?

Tighter fail-timeouts reduce latency but require precise boundary condition verification. Without accurate failure mode definitions, aggressive timeout rules in the Fallback harness may compromise stable system operation during performance-critical routing.