failureCaseMiner

Extracts GitHub failure cases into a structured FAILURE-CASES.md file.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/TeamFlint-Dev/vibe-coding-cn --skill failurecaseminer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: failureCaseMiner
Source: https://github.com/TeamFlint-Dev/vibe-coding-cn/tree/main/skills/github/ghAgenticWorkflows/workUnits/failureCaseMiner
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/TeamFlint-Dev/vibe-coding-cn --skill failurecaseminer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the process of identifying, extracting, and documenting failure cases from various sources like issues, pull requests, and code comments, preventing recurring mistakes.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Automated Scanning: Scans recent GitHub issues, pull requests, and code comments for potential failure cases.
  • Case Refinement: Structures extracted information into 'phenomenon', 'root cause', 'fix', and 'lessons learned'.
  • Knowledge Deposition: Writes refined failure cases into a FAILURE-CASES.md file within a specified Skill's knowledge package.
  • Use Case: After a sprint, run this Skill to automatically gather all reported bugs and their resolutions, consolidating them into a central knowledge base for future reference and learning.

Quick Start

Run the failureCaseMiner skill to scan the last 30 days of issues and pull requests for failure cases and save them to the failureCaseMiner skill's knowledge package.

Frequently Asked Questions about failureCaseMiner

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automatically extract failure cases from GitHub issues and pull requests?

To automatically extract failure cases from GitHub issues and pull requests, run a scan of recent development activity to identify bugs and their resolutions. This process structures the findings into phenomenon, root cause, fix, and lessons learned for documentation.

What is the best way to document recurring code review mistakes for future knowledge management?

Documenting recurring code review mistakes for knowledge management involves codifying past errors into a structured file. By extracting issue details and resolutions into a centralized markdown file, teams create a reference base to prevent similar failures.

How do I consolidate sprint bugs and their resolutions into a central knowledge base?

To consolidate sprint bugs and resolutions into a central knowledge base, scan recent GitHub activity and aggregate the extracted failure data. The refined cases are then deposited into a designated markdown file for team learning and future reference.

Does failure case documentation require manually structuring root cause and fix details?

Failure case documentation does not require manually structuring root cause and fix details. The automation process refines extracted GitHub comments and issues into categorized fields including phenomenon, root cause, fix, and lessons learned automatically.

What time frame of GitHub activity is scanned for extracting and codifying failure cases?

The default time frame scanned for extracting and codifying failure cases from GitHub activity is the last 30 days. This scanning period covers recent issues, pull requests, and code comments to ensure current failure data is captured.