Coordinate multi-agent AI council discussions to reach documented consensus.
npx skills add https://github.com/firebreak-ai/firebreak --skill fbk-council
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: fbk-council Source: https://github.com/firebreak-ai/firebreak/tree/main/assets/skills/fbk-council Command: npx skills add https://github.com/firebreak-ai/firebreak --skill fbk-council
This Skill provides a framework for organizing and managing multi-agent AI council discussions, enabling systematic decision-making across technical, security, UX, and data metrics domains.
Prompt the AI to initialize a council session for reviewing a new API design or security architecture proposal.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Multi-agent AI council orchestration is a structured collaboration framework where role-specific agents review, deliberate, and reach consensus on complex technical or strategic decisions. It ensures thorough analysis and documented outcomes through phased discussion and conflict resolution protocols.
Initialize a council session by prompting the AI with role-specific guidance for architect, builder, and security roles. The system guides you through internal alignment, clarification, independent discussion, and consensus synthesis phases to produce a documented architectural decision.
Yes, structured multi-agent collaboration supports security assessments by assigning a guardian or security agent role to independently analyze proposals. The council's phased discussion and conflict resolution protocols ensure comprehensive security review and documented consensus before implementation.
Coordinating AI agents for product design consensus works best by assigning advocate and analyst roles alongside technical agents. The structured phases of independent discussion and consensus synthesis ensure comprehensive exploration of UX and data metrics before finalizing design decisions.
External research integration is required for reliable AI team decision-making. The council framework incorporates external research during the independent discussion phase to ensure decisions are grounded in comprehensive data and thorough analysis.
You should avoid using a multi-agent AI council for simple, single-domain decisions that do not require cross-functional consensus. The framework's phased discussion and conflict resolution protocols are designed for complex technical, security, or architectural decisions needing thorough multi-perspective analysis.
TymorIbrahimConvene a four-voice council to analyze ambiguous decisions and tradeoffs.
niltonfredericoGenerate Markdown documentation with Mermaid diagrams for Django projects.
truongnatPerform STRIDE threat analysis and OWASP-guided vulnerability assessments.
fabioc-alohaAssesses AI readiness across value, technical, user, and social dimensions using AIRS framework.
