What problem does it solve? Medical device manufacturers entering the US market struggle to determine whether their device requires a 510(k) premarket notification, which submission type to choose, and how to build a complete substantial equivalence argument without triggering an RTA rejection. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Pathway Determination: Judges whether a device is 510(k)-exempt, needs Traditional/Abbreviated/Special/PCCP/Third-Party submission, or requires PMA, with a quick decision flowchart. - Predicate & SE Analysis: Guides predicate device lookup via FDA databases and generates a 12-column substantial equivalence comparison table with difference justification. - 2026 Compliance Coverage: Integrates QMSR (effective 2026-02-02), HFE final guidance categories 1/2/3, PCCP modules for AI devices, Section 524B cybersecurity requirements, eSTAR 7.0, and a 29-item RTA rejection checklist. - Use Case: A Chinese manufacturer of an AI-enabled connected monitor asks whether it needs a 510(k); the skill outputs the submission type, predicate candidates, HFE category, PCCP modules, cybersecurity section, fee estimate, and full document checklist. ## Quick Start Describe your medical device and ask the skill to determine whether it needs an FDA 510(k) and to produce the recommended submission type, predicate candidates, and complete document checklist.