feature-delivery

Select and apply standard, TDD, or refactor workflows for code changes.

Updated Apr 4, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/anionzo/skill --skill feature-delivery-anionzo
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: feature-delivery
Source: https://github.com/anionzo/skill/tree/main/skills/feature-delivery
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/anionzo/skill --skill feature-delivery-anionzo

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill guides teams to deliver code changes by selecting and applying the appropriate discipline (standard, tdd, or refactor) to match the nature of the change.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Mode-driven guidance for standard, tdd, and refactor workflows.
  • Verification and test discipline: red-green-refactor, planning, and safety nets.
  • Structured handoff and documentation outputs to ensure traceability.

Quick Start

Instruct the system to choose the right mode for a given change, then apply the corresponding workflow and verification steps.

Frequently Asked Questions about feature-delivery

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I choose the right workflow discipline for a new code change?

To choose the right workflow discipline, evaluate the nature of the change to select standard, TDD, or refactor mode. This ensures the delivery process matches the required verification and safety nets for the specific code modification.

What is the Iron Law of TDD for feature delivery?

The Iron Law of TDD enforces strict red-green-refactor cycles during feature delivery. It mandates writing failing tests first, implementing minimal code to pass, and then refactoring, ensuring robust verification before completion.

How do I apply test driven development planning to a refactoring task?

Apply TDD planning to refactoring by using the refactor workflow mode, which relies on existing safety nets. You verify behavior before and after changes, ensuring minimal scope modifications without altering external functionality.

Can I use a standard workflow for complex feature verification?

You can use the standard workflow for feature verification, but it is best suited for changes not requiring strict TDD. Complex changes may need TDD or refactor modes to ensure adequate safety nets and thorough verification checks.

When should I avoid standard mode and switch to refactor workflow?

Avoid standard mode and switch to refactor workflow when the code change involves restructuring existing internal logic without altering external behavior. The refactor mode provides specific verification checks and safety nets suited for structural improvements.

What's the best way to document structured handoffs after completing a feature?

The best way to document structured handoffs is to use the documented outputs generated by the workflow. This provides traceability by recording the selected mode, verification checks, and completion status before passing the code change downstream.