feature-organizer

Organize uncommitted code changes into a feature with tests, docs, and Git workflow.

1|Updated Feb 11, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/xiaoshuangLi/aibo --skill feature-organizer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: feature-organizer
Source: https://github.com/xiaoshuangLi/aibo/tree/main/skills/feature-organizer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/xiaoshuangLi/aibo --skill feature-organizer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

当前团队在将未提交的代码变更快速转化为可交付的软件特征时,缺乏统一的工作流、测试覆盖与文档输出,导致重复劳动和产物不一致。

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 将未提交或分支中的变更整理成完整的 feature,包含测试、文档和 git 工作流。
  • 统一的功能变更清单、技术设计和风险评估输出,便于审查和合并。
  • 通过自动化校验(测试覆盖、需求提取、文档完整性、提交结构校验)提升交付质量。

Quick Start

请将当前未提交的代码变更整理为一个完整的功能并附上测试、文档和 Git 工作流。

Frequently Asked Questions about feature-organizer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I organize uncommitted code changes into a complete feature with tests and documentation?

To organize uncommitted code changes into a complete feature, this Skill packages scattered edits into a cohesive unit by applying validation scripts for test coverage, requirements extraction, feature documentation, and commit-structure checks. It outputs a production-ready feature package compatible with standard Git workflows.

What is the best way to convert scattered code edits into a cohesive feature package?

Converting scattered code edits into a cohesive feature package requires applying an automated workflow that generates technical designs, risk assessments, and feature documentation. This Skill standardizes the transformation of uncommitted changes into a unified deliverable with complete validation outputs.

How does automated validation improve feature delivery for code changes?

Automated validation improves feature delivery by running scripts that check test coverage, extract requirements, verify documentation completeness, and validate commit structure. This ensures code changes meet quality-assurance standards before being packaged into a production-ready feature.

Can I use this workflow to generate feature documentation and risk assessments for uncommitted changes?

Yes, you can generate feature documentation and risk assessments for uncommitted changes. The workflow automatically extracts requirements and produces unified feature change lists, technical designs, and risk evaluations to facilitate code review and merge processes.

Does this approach work with standard Git workflow commit-structure checks?

Yes, this approach works with standard Git workflows by validating commit structure through automated scripts. It ensures that uncommitted code changes are organized into a complete feature package with outputs compatible with the repository's existing commit and merge processes.

When do I need to turn code changes into production-ready features using an automated workflow?

You need to turn code changes into production-ready features when your team lacks a unified workflow for delivering software features, causing repetitive labor and inconsistent outputs. This occurs when scattered edits require standardized testing, documentation, and Git workflow integration before delivery.