feature-plan

Document a design decision by framing a testable choice after reading requirements and gap analysis, scoping at least two concrete alternatives with explicit rejection reasons and evidence-backed rationale. Generate the artifact in wiki/decisions or wiki/domains to ensure traceability and operator review.

Transition by reading document-stage artifacts like requirements and gap analysis, then producing a design artifact aligned to wiki templates that includes alternatives and evidence. Update the task state accordingly to enable scaffold transition and maintain workflow traceability.

Yes, gap analysis and requirements artifacts are required before framing a design decision. The design process reads these document-stage artifacts to ground the design work, ensuring the resulting artifact in wiki/decisions or wiki/domains is evidence-backed and testable.

Yes, you can generate architecture decision records that pass linting and support operator review. The artifact is produced in wiki/decisions or wiki/domains with at least two concrete alternatives, explicit rejection reasons, and evidence-backed rationale for operator evaluation.

Architecture decision documentation integrates by guiding the transition from document to scaffold with traceability. After reading requirements and gap analysis, it produces a design artifact that updates the task state, enabling the next workflow stage while maintaining auditable artifacts.

Including at least two alternatives when creating a design decision artifact ensures auditable and evidence-backed rationale. Explicit rejection reasons for each alternative provide traceability for operator review and demonstrate thorough evaluation before generating the final artifact in wiki/decisions.