feature-review

Review feature specifications, score quality, and generate Gherkin scenarios.

Updated Nov 1, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/nschneble/rails-superstack --skill feature-review-nschneble
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: feature-review
Source: https://github.com/nschneble/rails-superstack/tree/main/.agents/skills/feature-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/nschneble/rails-superstack --skill feature-review-nschneble

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Reviews feature specifications for completeness, clarity, and quality. Scores specs, identifies gaps, generates missing Gherkin scenarios, and provides actionable improvement suggestions. Use when the user wants to review a feature spec, validate requirements, or mentions spec review, specification quality, or requirements validation.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Review specs, score, identify gaps, and produce a structured review report.
  • Generate missing Gherkin scenarios for documented user flows.
  • Provide actionable improvement suggestions and remediation guidance.
  • Support requests that mention spec validation, quality assessment, or requirements verification.

Quick Start

Submit a feature specification document and run the feature-review skill to generate a structured review report.

Frequently Asked Questions about feature-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I review feature specifications for gaps and quality issues?

To review feature specifications, submit a written spec document for automated scoring and gap analysis. The review generates a structured report identifying missing requirements and providing actionable improvement suggestions for specification quality.

Can I generate Gherkin scenarios from existing feature specifications?

Yes, you can generate missing Gherkin scenarios from existing feature specifications. The automated review analyzes documented user flows and produces Gherkin scenarios to validate requirements and support specification quality assessment.

What is the best way to validate requirements before development starts?

Validating requirements before development is best achieved by scoring specification documents for completeness and generating Gherkin scenarios. This automated review process produces remediation guidance that reveals gaps in feature specifications early.

Does automated spec review work with RSpec and Gherkin formats?

Automated spec review works with written feature specifications and generates Gherkin scenarios for validation. It assesses specification quality and produces structured review reports with suggested edits, supporting requirements validation workflows using Gherkin.

How do I get actionable improvement suggestions for incomplete feature specs?

To get actionable improvement suggestions for incomplete feature specs, submit the document for automated review. The process scores specification quality, identifies gaps in requirements, and outputs a structured report with remediation guidance and suggested edits.

When should I use automated specification review instead of manual validation?

Use automated specification review when validating requirements across teams to systematically score spec quality and identify gaps. It generates Gherkin scenarios and structured reports with remediation guidance, replacing manual validation for written feature specifications.