Feedback Loop - Self-Improvement

Capture runtime signals and generate structured improvement entries for AI library maintenance.

Updated Jan 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/theofernandezz/ai-library --skill feedback-loop-self-improvement
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: Feedback Loop - Self-Improvement
Source: https://github.com/theofernandezz/ai-library/tree/main/.opencode/skills/feedback-loop
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/theofernandezz/ai-library --skill feedback-loop-self-improvement

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill enables continuous improvement of the AI library by capturing learnings from real tasks, logging signals when gaps, missing patterns, or outdated guidance occur, and surfacing actionable improvements for maintenance.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Runtime signals are captured mid-task to surface gaps, missing patterns, or outdated guidance.
  • Post-task reviews generate structured learnings and suggested improvements to skill docs and patterns.
  • Periodic maintainer signals aggregate insights for library evolution and quality checks.

Quick Start

After finishing a feature, run the self-improvement workflow to log runtime signals and post-task learnings.

Frequently Asked Questions about Feedback Loop - Self-Improvement

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I capture runtime signals to improve my AI library?

To capture runtime signals for self-improvement, run the post-task review workflow after finishing a feature. This logs structured learnings and suggested improvements to skill docs and patterns for actionable updates.

What is mid-task gap detection for AI maintenance?

Mid-task gap detection identifies missing patterns or outdated guidance during active execution. It captures these runtime signals to trigger immediate improvements across skills within the AI library.

How do post-task reviews generate actionable improvements for software engineering?

Post-task reviews generate structured learnings by analyzing completed work. They produce suggested improvements to skill documentation and patterns, creating standardized entries for library maintenance.

Can I use periodic maintainer signals for library quality checks?

Yes, periodic maintainer signals aggregate captured runtime insights to enable library evolution and quality checks. They compile mid-task gaps and post-task learnings into actionable maintenance updates.

Do I need standardized review workflows to trigger AI library improvements?

Yes, standardized review workflows are required to generate actionable updates. The self-improvement process depends on clear signal types and structured improvement entries to trigger effective maintenance.