ferrox-ns-review

Route code review and debugging requests by classifying your intent, which directs the goal to the correct specialized skill for analysis, security review, or forensics. Intent classification ensures the appropriate quality workflow is invoked from a single request.

Distinguish between a code audit and a validation scenario by defining your end goal, as review workflow selection maps analysis, fix, audit, and validation paths to separate downstream skills based on the specific quality task requested.

You need intent classification for security review and UI review tasks when managing multi-purpose quality workflows, ensuring the request applies to the correct specialized evaluation path rather than a generic review flow.

Routing a failing feature review to a debugging path works by matching the user's fix intent, invoking the debugging skill directly instead of a generic code review flow to address the specific failure scenario.

You can use a single request for multiple quality workflows like code review and forensics, as the routing skill maps your goal to the correct specialized path for evaluation, audit, or forensics scenarios.

The limitation of using automated routing for quality and audit tasks is that it requires accurate intent classification, meaning ambiguous requests may route to the wrong specialized skill if the review or validation goal is not clearly defined.