figma-design-review

To check if your Figma design meets product requirements, run a structured PM review that maps each requirement to covered, partially covered, or missing status with concrete design observations. This validates user flows and UI state completeness against the original product spec.

A PM design review for pre-handoff Figma concepts systematically verifies design coverage against product requirements before engineering handoff. It evaluates user flows and edge UI states like error, empty, and loading to prevent development delays.

Evaluate user flow and UI state completeness in Figma by checking whether designed flows include key steps and critical states like error, empty, and loading. This identifies missing UX states before final PM approval.

Yes, you can use a structured design review for mid-fidelity Figma designs, as well as concept and pre-handoff stages. It produces outcome-focused concerns categorized as blocking, should fix, or nice to fix, alongside open questions with assigned owners.

The best way to get a PM approval status for a Figma design is to generate a requirements coverage table alongside UX concerns and open questions. This produces an explicit approval decision based on outcome-focused PM review criteria.

A Figma design handoff gets delayed by missing edge states because the design fails to cover the full user journey, including error, empty, and loading states. Running a requirements coverage check prevents these handoff-ready delays.