final-review

Assess implemented behavior fidelity against approved spec and plan before workflow closure.

2|Updated Mar 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/bdemarzo/ai-workflows --skill final-review-bdemarzo
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: final-review
Source: https://github.com/bdemarzo/ai-workflows/tree/main/skills/final-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/bdemarzo/ai-workflows --skill final-review-bdemarzo

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

It prevents workflow closure from happening before implemented behavior truly matches the approved idea, spec, and plan, and before docs close-out can proceed safely.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Fidelity-focused final review: Checks implemented behavior against idea/spec/plan alignment, regression risks, and unresolved gaps from implementation review.
  • Evidence-first validation: Keeps validation output in view and incorporates browser verification evidence for any changed rendered local UI behavior.
  • Artifact-driven reporting: Writes a new non-overwriting final review round to the workflow docs tree so the record remains auditable without chat history.

Quick Start

Run final-review for the workflow dossier slug and provide the implementation summary and the latest implementation-review round so the skill can generate the next final review round artifact.

Frequently Asked Questions about final-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I verify spec alignment and check for regression gaps before closing a workflow?

A final review assessment verifies implemented behavior matches the approved idea, spec, and plan before workflow closure by checking fidelity, regression risks, and unresolved gaps. It produces a ready-for-close-out recommendation with auditable findings.

What is a fidelity check and when do I need it for workflow closure?

A fidelity check confirms implemented behavior aligns with the approved idea, spec, and plan. It is needed during end-of-workflow verification after implementation review to catch drift, gaps, and ensure docs close-out readiness before approving closure.

How do I document browser verification evidence for changed UI behavior during a final review?

Browser verification evidence for changed rendered local UI behavior is incorporated into the final review output by keeping validation results in view. The assessment writes findings to a non-overwriting round file in the workflow docs tree.

Can I perform a final review without the latest implementation-review round?

The latest implementation-review round and implementation summary are required inputs. The final review uses them to validate drift, check unresolved gaps, and generate the next final review round artifact for the workflow dossier.

Does final review overwrite previous review rounds in the workflow docs tree?

No, final review writes a new non-overwriting round file to the workflow docs path at reviews/final/round-XX.md. This ensures the validation record remains auditable without relying on chat history, preserving all prior review artifacts.

What happens if the fidelity assessment finds drift between the spec and implemented behavior?

If drift or gaps are found, the final review produces a loopback recommendation instead of ready-for-close-out. The assessment explicitly records a validated reviewer roster and concise findings-first results to guide resolution before closure can proceed.