find-logical-fallacies

Identify and explain logical fallacies in provided text.

Updated Mar 30, 2026

Search Tags:#text analysis #business analysis #logical fallacies #reasoning analysis #argument evaluation

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/Eric-Pacheco95/claude-workbench --skill find-logical-fallacies

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: find-logical-fallacies
Source: https://github.com/Eric-Pacheco95/claude-workbench/tree/main/.claude/skills/find-logical-fallacies
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Eric-Pacheco95/claude-workbench --skill find-logical-fallacies

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps identify logical fallacies, hidden assumptions, and reasoning flaws in any text, providing clear explanations and recommendations for improvement.

Core Features & Use Cases

Logical Fallacy Detection: Identifies common fallacies like false dilemma, hasty generalization, and ad hominem.
Text Analysis: Processes proposals, PRDs, meeting notes, and more to highlight problematic reasoning.
Use Case: Before finalizing a business case, use this Skill to ensure that the arguments are valid and well-supported.

Quick Start

Analyze the reasoning in the following proposal using the logical fallacies skill: /find-logical-fallacies "We should proceed with the project because it's the only viable option."

Frequently Asked Questions about find-logical-fallacies

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I check text for logical fallacies and reasoning flaws?▼

To check text for logical fallacies, you can analyze the document to identify and explain problematic reasoning. This process matches the text's argument structure against standard fallacy categories to highlight hidden assumptions.

What is logical fallacy detection in business proposals?▼

Logical fallacy detection in business proposals is the process of evaluating argument structures to find reasoning flaws like false dilemmas or hasty generalizations. It ensures business cases are valid and well-supported before finalizing.

Can I analyze meeting notes for false dilemmas and ad hominem arguments?▼

Yes, you can analyze meeting notes for false dilemmas, ad hominem attacks, and other common fallacies. The analysis processes the text to highlight problematic reasoning and provides clear explanations for each identified flaw.

How do I evaluate argument structure in a PRD?▼

To evaluate argument structure in a PRD, input the document text for logical analysis. The system identifies reasoning flaws and hidden assumptions, providing recommendations for improvement to ensure your product requirements are logically sound.

Are there limitations when using automated reasoning analysis for research findings?▼

Automated reasoning analysis for research findings requires logical evaluation to match text to standard fallacy categories. While it effectively spots structural flaws, users should manually review the context to ensure the identified fallacies are truly problematic.

What is the best way to find hasty generalizations in a business case?▼

The best way to find hasty generalizations in a business case is to perform logical analysis on the provided text. This identifies reasoning flaws and hidden assumptions, offering clear explanations and recommendations to improve your argument.