firewall-best-practices-audit

Audit normalized firewall rulebases for security hygiene and operational gaps.

9|Updated Mar 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/fastrevmd-lab/fwskillsshare --skill firewall-best-practices-audit-fastrevmd-lab
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: firewall-best-practices-audit
Source: https://github.com/fastrevmd-lab/fwskillsshare/tree/main/skills/firewall-best-practices-audit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/fastrevmd-lab/fwskillsshare --skill firewall-best-practices-audit-fastrevmd-lab

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Firewall rulebases accumulate any-any permits, shadowed rules, missing logging, weak VPN crypto, and exposed management services that are hard to spot by manual review. This Skill audits normalized Cisco, Fortinet, Palo Alto, and Juniper configurations against a vendor-neutral check catalog and produces prioritized, evidence-grounded findings instead of vague verdicts. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Vendor-neutral rulebase audit: Runs security checks (any-any, shadowed/redundant/overlapping rules, missing deny-all, exposed management, weak IKE/IPsec crypto) and operational checks (unused objects, oversized groups, naming gaps) over the shared parsing-* intermediate JSON schema. - Device-plane hardening coverage: Evaluates SSH root login, password/lockout policy, zone screens, host-inbound exposure, control-plane protection, IPv6 posture, and remote logging completeness. - Severity and confidence discipline: Every finding carries a severity, a definitive/heuristic confidence label, affected references, rationale, and per-vendor remediation snippets; skipped checks are reported rather than silently dropped. - Use Case: Given a raw Juniper SRX configuration, the Skill routes it through the matching parser, then reports that the policy set is empty, root SSH login is allowed, and the configured IDP/UTM stack is attached to no policy — each with concrete Junos fix commands. ## Quick Start Use the firewall-best-practices-audit skill to audit this parsed firewall configuration and list the prioritized findings with remediation.

Frequently Asked Questions about firewall-best-practices-audit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit a firewall rulebase for security best practices?

Provide the normalized intermediate JSON schema produced by a parsing-* skill, or supply the raw vendor config so the matching parser runs first. The audit then checks permissiveness, shadowing, logging, VPN crypto, and device hardening, and returns prioritized findings with fixes.

What firewall vendors does this audit support?

It supports Cisco ASA/Firepower, Fortinet FortiGate, Palo Alto PAN-OS, and Juniper SRX through the shared vendor-neutral schema. Vendors without a parser cannot be audited structurally, though manually normalized schemas or pasted excerpts can be reviewed without finding IDs.

Can I audit a raw firewall config without parsing it first?

No. Raw configs must be routed through the matching parsing-* skill (parsing-cisco-configs, parsing-fortinet-configs, parsing-palo-configs, or parsing-srx-configs) to produce the intermediate schema. The audit never re-implements parsing itself.

Does the firewall audit check compliance with frameworks like PCI or NIST?

No. The audit is deliberately framework-agnostic: it reports whether the rulebase follows general security best practice and never cites control IDs or claims an environment is compliant. It reports findings, not verdicts.

Why are some firewall audit findings labeled heuristic instead of definitive?

A finding is downgraded to heuristic when the schema cannot fully support the conclusion, such as incomplete rule ordering for shadow detection, unresolved object references, or NAT that may change real exposure. Heuristic labels signal reviewers to verify before acting.

What happens when the parsed config is missing data a check needs?

The dependent check is skipped rather than guessed, and every skipped check is listed in the audit summary so the coverage gap is visible. This applies to hit-count data, unpopulated dynamic-application fields, and similar schema gaps.