fix

Automate review findings into actionable fixes with parallel investigation and user-reviewed edits.

1|Updated Jan 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/wgordon17/personal-claude-marketplace --skill fix-wgordon17
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: fix
Source: https://github.com/wgordon17/personal-claude-marketplace/tree/main/code-quality/skills/fix
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/wgordon17/personal-claude-marketplace --skill fix-wgordon17

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates turning review findings into actionable fixes by reading session outputs, performing background analysis, and guiding safe implementations without auto-committing.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Normalize and centralize findings from pr-review, plan-review, and bug-investigation into a unified work queue.
  • Phase-driven workflow: detection, triage, investigation, and sequential implementation with safeguards.
  • Non-destructive edits: never auto-commit; requires user review before applying changes.
  • Parallel investigation and plan updates across targets; supports code and plan edits, including spike handling.

Quick Start

Run /fix to begin automatically locating findings from the current session and applying safe fixes.

Frequently Asked Questions about fix

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate turning code review findings into fixes without auto-committing?

Automating fixes from review findings involves reading session outputs, performing background analysis, and guiding safe implementations with non-destructive edits that require user review before any commit occurs.

Can I triage and normalize findings from pr-review and bug-investigation into a single work queue?

Yes, you can normalize and centralize findings from pr-review, plan-review, and bug-investigation sessions into a unified work queue for streamlined triage and sequential implementation.

How does parallel investigation work when fixing code and plan review findings?

Parallel investigation dispatches multiple investigators across targets simultaneously, updating plans and applying changes with safeguards while supporting both code edits and spike handling.

What is the best way to apply non-destructive code edits from a bug investigation?

The best approach uses a phase-driven workflow of detection, triage, investigation, and sequential implementation, ensuring all edits are validated and reviewed by the user before applying changes.

Does automated triage support both code edits and plan updates?

Yes, automated triage supports both code and plan edits, including spike handling, dispatching parallel investigators to apply changes with safeguards across all target areas.

Why does the fix workflow require user review before committing changes?

The workflow requires user review before committing changes to enforce non-destructive edits, ensuring validation and safeguards are met without auto-committing potentially unsafe modifications.