fixing-underperforming-teams

Diagnose team dysfunction and structure recovery plans using leadership frameworks.

1.3k|169|Updated Jan 29, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/RefoundAI/lenny-skills --skill fixing-underperforming-teams
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: fixing-underperforming-teams
Source: https://github.com/RefoundAI/lenny-skills/tree/main/skills/fixing-underperforming-teams
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/RefoundAI/lenny-skills --skill fixing-underperforming-teams

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Leaders often struggle to identify why a team is underperforming and how to intervene without making things worse. This Skill provides diagnostic frameworks and structured playbooks to distinguish skill gaps from motivation issues, address leadership complicity, and execute turnarounds or talent decisions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Root-Cause Diagnosis: Apply frameworks like the Waterline Model, Performance Diagnosis (can't do / won't do / not set up to do), and the Five Elements of Change to pinpoint whether dysfunction is structural, interpersonal, or individual.
  • Turnaround Playbooks: Use the OISA framework (Observe, Identify, Share, Act), the Team Diagnosis Document template, and step-by-step playbooks for resetting goals, revamping processes, or moving an underperforming EM.
  • Talent Decision Support: Apply the Enthusiastic Rehire Test and scripts for direct feedback, difficult conversations, and graceful terminations.
  • Use Case: A new skip-level leader inherits a team missing deadlines. Use this Skill to diagnose whether the cause is a missing strategy, a struggling line manager, or low motivation, then follow the five-step turnaround checklist to set expectations, raise the bar, and act.

Quick Start

Ask the Skill to help diagnose why your engineering team keeps missing deadlines and draft a recovery plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about fixing-underperforming-teams

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I diagnose why my team is underperforming?

Start with neutral observation: sit in meetings, review documents, and interview team members. Then apply diagnostic frameworks like the Waterline Model to check structural issues before interpersonal ones, and the can't do / won't do / not set up to do model to classify each performance gap.

How do I turn around an underperforming team as a new leader?

Follow the five-step playbook: set expectations with your manager, set a high quality bar, motivate the team around personal goals, use the OISA framework (Observe, Identify, Share, Act), and find allies. Expect 6-12 months before significant business impact.

What is the Enthusiastic Rehire Test for performance management?

The Enthusiastic Rehire Test asks: knowing what you know today, would you enthusiastically rehire this person for the same role? A 'no' triggers action such as a difficult conversation, performance plan, role change, or parting ways, cutting through rationalization about underperformers.

When is underperformance a strategy problem instead of a people problem?

Recurring problems that resurface after fixes are usually strategy, culture, or interpersonal issues rather than execution gaps. Check for missing product strategy, misaligned OKRs, or incentives that punish cross-team collaboration before blaming individuals.

How should I handle an underperforming engineering manager?

Collect input from those raising the issue, form your own POV, get your manager's support, then meet with the EM to share feedback. Avoid covering for them by doing their job, which hides the problem and prevents organizational learning.

What are common mistakes when fixing a struggling team?

Common mistakes include ruinous empathy (withholding direct criticism), pulling double duty for a struggling manager, blaming individuals for structural role confusion, and delaying talent decisions. Keeping bad hires too long damages culture and drives away top performers.