fixme-review-code

Evidence-backed code review identifies defects by reading the implementation plan, spec, and modified files to ensure plan compliance. It verifies that all plan steps have corresponding changes and detects unplanned deviations using cited evidence from the actual diffs.

Evidence-based code review identifies defects by reading the implementation plan, spec, and modified files to gather citations. It produces structured findings with traceability to plan tasks and changed artifacts, ensuring objective defect reporting across the entire pipeline.

You check test quality and artifact adequacy by running a review workflow that reads all changed files and context. It evaluates each plan step to ensure artifacts are adequate and tests meet quality standards, generating actionable remediation steps with citations.

No, the fixme pipeline review workflow requires no external dependencies to perform evidence-backed code review. It operates standalone, reading the plan, spec, and changed files directly to produce findings with citations and remediation suggestions.

Automated code review misses deviations when it does not cross-reference the implementation plan, spec, and modified files together. Evidence-backed review solves this by reading all relevant files to gather citations, verifying every plan step has corresponding changes without unplanned deviations.