fixme-review-code

Review code changes against plan and spec with cited evidence.

Updated Feb 18, 2026

Search Tags:#debugging #evidence #code-review #test-quality #artifact-verification #plan-compliance

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/denis-pingin/fixme --skill fixme-review-code

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: fixme-review-code
Source: https://github.com/denis-pingin/fixme/tree/main/.claude/skills/fixme-review-code
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/denis-pingin/fixme --skill fixme-review-code

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps automation pipelines identify defects, gaps, and deviations between the plan, spec, and actual changes by reading all relevant files and gathering evidence for each finding.

Core Features & Use Cases

Evidence-based findings: require citations from the plan, the spec, diffs, and changed files.
Plan-compliance checks: verify that all plan steps have corresponding changes and no unplanned deviations.
Structured reporting: produce actionable remediation suggestions with traceability to plan tasks and changed artifacts.

Quick Start

Run the review workflow on the latest plan execution results to generate evidence-backed findings and remediation steps.

Frequently Asked Questions about fixme-review-code

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I verify code changes match the implementation plan and spec?▼

Evidence-backed code review identifies defects by reading the implementation plan, spec, and modified files to ensure plan compliance. It verifies that all plan steps have corresponding changes and detects unplanned deviations using cited evidence from the actual diffs.

What is evidence-based code review and how does it work?▼

Evidence-based code review identifies defects by reading the implementation plan, spec, and modified files to gather citations. It produces structured findings with traceability to plan tasks and changed artifacts, ensuring objective defect reporting across the entire pipeline.

How do I check test quality and artifact adequacy across plan steps?▼

You check test quality and artifact adequacy by running a review workflow that reads all changed files and context. It evaluates each plan step to ensure artifacts are adequate and tests meet quality standards, generating actionable remediation steps with citations.

Does the fixme pipeline review workflow require external dependencies?▼

No, the fixme pipeline review workflow requires no external dependencies to perform evidence-backed code review. It operates standalone, reading the plan, spec, and changed files directly to produce findings with citations and remediation suggestions.

Why does my automated code review miss deviations from the implementation plan?▼

Automated code review misses deviations when it does not cross-reference the implementation plan, spec, and modified files together. Evidence-backed review solves this by reading all relevant files to gather citations, verifying every plan step has corresponding changes without unplanned deviations.