flow-plan-review

A Carmack-level plan review applies rigorous criteria like simplicity, architecture, edge cases, and security to evaluate implementation plans and design specifications. It audits documentation to ensure technical decisions are robust before development begins.

You can automate design doc reviews by coordinating RepoPrompt for context building and rp-cli for chat. The workflow guides through file selection, context discovery, and iterative evaluation to produce actionable feedback on your plans.

Yes, automated plan review requires rp-cli and RepoPrompt access. The workflow verifies prerequisites, proper window selection, and access to supporting docs and artifacts to assemble comprehensive context for evaluation.

Yes, you can focus an architecture review on specific concerns by providing focus parameters during session initiation. The evaluation applies structured discovery to surface relevant patterns and docs around your specified focus areas.

The best way to share a plan review is by exporting the comprehensive review prompt alongside the selected context. This enables stakeholders to view the exact artifacts and critique criteria used during the evaluation session.

Structured discovery improves implementation plan evaluation by automatically surfacing relevant files, docs, and code patterns. This lets reviewers focus on critique rather than manually scavenging context, resulting in a more thorough review.