flow-skill-fix-tests

Diagnoses and fixes failing tests through a guided, step-by-step workflow.

3|Updated Oct 5, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/korchasa/flow --skill flow-skill-fix-tests
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: flow-skill-fix-tests
Source: https://github.com/korchasa/flow/tree/main/framework/skills/flow-skill-fix-tests
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/korchasa/flow --skill flow-skill-fix-tests

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides a structured, repeatable workflow for diagnosing and fixing failing tests by guiding developers through error analysis, test isolation, reproduction, hypothesis formation, minimal-code changes, and full verification to prevent regressions.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Error analysis and log review: identify where failures originate by studying stack traces, messages, and test outputs.
  • Isolate and reproduce: narrow down to the smallest failing scenario and recreate the issue deterministically.
  • Hypothesis-driven debugging: generate testable hypotheses about root causes and validate them with controlled changes and tests.
  • Minimal, verifiable fixes: implement the smallest possible changes and verify that the entire test suite passes to avoid unintended regressions.

Quick Start

Describe the failing test to start the guided, step-by-step debugging workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions about flow-skill-fix-tests

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I fix failing tests using a structured debugging workflow?

To fix failing tests, you guide through error analysis, test isolation, reproduction, hypothesis validation, minimal code changes, and full verification to prevent regressions.

What is hypothesis-driven debugging and how does it help resolve test failures?

Hypothesis-driven debugging generates testable hypotheses about root causes and validates them with controlled changes, ensuring you systematically identify and resolve failing test scenarios.

How do I isolate and reproduce a failing test scenario deterministically?

You isolate and reproduce failing tests by narrowing down to the smallest failing scenario and recreating the issue deterministically using available test results and source code.

Can I use this debugging workflow across different programming languages and test frameworks?

Yes, this workflow applies to projects with failing test suites across languages, requiring only access to test results, source code, and a framework that records validation steps.

What's the best way to prevent regressions when applying minimal code changes to fix tests?

Prevent regressions by implementing the smallest possible code changes and verifying that the entire test suite passes, ensuring your minimal fixes do not introduce unintended side effects.

Why do I need a framework that records decisions and validation steps to debug failing tests?

A framework that records decisions and validation steps is required to systematically document the hypothesis-driven debugging process, ensuring traceability and repeatability when fixing failing tests.