flowai-review-and-commit

Review Git diffs with QA checks and commit only approved changes.

1|1|Updated Mar 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/korchasa/foxcode --skill flowai-review-and-commit
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: flowai-review-and-commit
Source: https://github.com/korchasa/foxcode/tree/main/.claude/skills/flowai-review-and-commit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/korchasa/foxcode --skill flowai-review-and-commit

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This composite workflow automates the safe handling of code changes by separating QA review from the actual commit, ensuring only approved changes are recorded in version control.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Two-phase command: first review current changes (QA + code review), then commit only if approved. A verdict gate between the phases ensures only approved changes get committed.
  • Transparency & planning: outputs review reports, maintains task planning, and prevents accidental commits.
  • Lifecycle integration: supports git diff, staging checks, and an explicit gate decision to proceed or halt.

Quick Start

Invoke the flowai-review-and-commit skill to perform a two-phase review and only commit if approved.

Frequently Asked Questions about flowai-review-and-commit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate code review before a git commit?

Automating code review before a git commit involves a two-phase workflow that gathers diffs, runs QA checks, and enforces an explicit verdict gate to ensure only approved changes are committed.

What is a gated commit workflow in software engineering?

A gated commit workflow separates QA review from the actual commit, enforcing a strict verdict gate between phases so that only approved changes are recorded in version control.

How do I prevent accidental commits of unreviewed code changes?

Prevent accidental commits of unreviewed code by applying a gated workflow that requires an explicit gate decision to proceed or halt after generating a transparent review report.

Can I run QA checks and commit code in a single automated step?

Yes, you can run QA checks and commit code together using a composite workflow automation that executes code review first and only commits if the phase verdict is explicitly approved.

Does the gated commit workflow support transparent reporting of review results?

Yes, the gated commit workflow supports transparent reporting by outputting review reports and maintaining task planning to prevent accidental commits and provide lifecycle visibility.