folio:review

Name: folio:review
Availability: InStock
Author: Athan

Automate research draft reviews with IP safety checks, scoring, and iterative repair.

Updated Apr 15, 2026

Search Tags:#research #review #scoring #document analysis #critique #IP protection

Ready to run

npx skills add https://github.com/athan-dial/skills --skill folio-review

💬 Prompt for ChatGPT / Claude Chat▼

Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: folio:review
Source: https://github.com/athan-dial/skills/tree/main/plugins/folio/skills/review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/athan-dial/skills --skill folio-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates comprehensive review workflows, including IP scanning, critical assessment, scoring, and repair cycles, saving time and reducing manual effort.

Core Features & Use Cases

IP Redline and Safety Reports: Detects and reports violations in research drafts to ensure proprietary protection.
Hostile Review Analysis: Acts as an external critic for white papers and hybrid documents, identifying logical and factual issues.
Scorecard Generation and Repair: Evaluates arguments, evidence, and clarity, providing structured feedback and supporting iterative improvements during research paper development.

Quick Start

Run the review process on your draft to get an automated critique and scoring report, then make necessary adjustments before exporting the improved version.

Frequently Asked Questions about folio:review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema

How do I automate research paper critique and scoring for draft reviews?▼

To automate research paper critique and scoring, you can run a review process on your draft to generate structured feedback, evaluate arguments and evidence, and receive a comprehensive scorecard for iterative improvements.

What is IP protection scanning in research drafts and how does it work?▼

IP protection scanning in research drafts detects and reports proprietary violations through automated redline safety reports, ensuring sensitive intellectual property is identified and secured before publication.

Can I use automated hostile review analysis for white papers?▼

Yes, you can use automated hostile review analysis for white papers to act as an external critic, identifying logical inconsistencies, factual issues, and structural weaknesses in your hybrid documents.

Does the automated research review workflow support iterative repair cycles?▼

The automated research review workflow supports iterative repair cycles by providing structured feedback and scorecards that guide adjustments, allowing you to refine and export improved research drafts.

What is the best way to perform a critical analysis of a research paper?▼

The best way to perform a critical analysis of a research paper is to automate the review process, which evaluates arguments, evidence, and clarity while generating a structured scorecard for development.

Are there limitations to automated document analysis for research critiques?▼

Automated document analysis for research critiques focuses on structured feedback, scoring, and IP safety, meaning users must still manually interpret complex domain-specific logic and apply the suggested iterative repairs.