followup-cleanup

Preparing a code review plan for developer handoff involves pruning validated false positives and adding stale-data warnings to ensure the coding agent receives a clean, actionable list. This refinement mitigates risks of incorrect implementation by flagging potential repository changes.

The best way to remove false positives from a review plan is to prune items validated as non-issues or by-design. This prevents wasted effort and ensures the coding agent only processes relevant, actionable feedback before implementation.

Coding agents implement changes on incorrect line numbers because of stale data caused by repository updates. Adding explicit stale-data warnings to the review plan alerts the agent to verify line numbers and code context before making modifications.

Yes, you can refine a review plan to mitigate incorrect implementation risks by removing irrelevant items and adding crucial warnings. This ensures actionable items are presented clearly, preventing wasted effort on outdated code context.

You need to add stale-data warnings to a code review plan whenever potential repository changes might shift line numbers or code context. This alerts the coding agent to double-check the environment before executing the refined handoff.