forger-find

Ground definitions of works in live, citable, quote-verified sources.

1|Updated May 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/RyanDev1st/FORGER --skill forger-find
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: forger-find
Source: https://github.com/RyanDev1st/FORGER/tree/main/skills/forger/phases/find
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/RyanDev1st/FORGER --skill forger-find

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill solves the "hallucination-by-confidence" problem where AI agents generate internally coherent but factually incorrect architectures or designs by grounding all work in live, citable, and quote-verified sources.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Mode-Aware Lane Fan-out: Automatically scales research depth (quick, standard, or deep) based on the project requirements.
  • Adversarial Grounding: Uses parallel lane agents (Production, Community, Frontier) to cross-reference vendor documentation, practitioner war stories, and contrarian viewpoints.
  • Deterministic Gates: Enforces strict validation of source ledgers and claim entailment before allowing the agent to proceed to design or execution.

Quick Start

Use the forger-find skill to ground the current workspace definition of works in live sources by running the standard research pipeline.

Frequently Asked Questions about forger-find

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate AI-generated system designs against factually correct sources?

You prevent hallucination-by-confidence by enforcing deterministic audit gates that validate source ledgers and claim entailment. This ensures factual accuracy before the agent proceeds to design or execution.

How do I prevent AI agents from generating factually incorrect architectures?

You prevent hallucination-by-confidence by enforcing deterministic audit gates that validate source ledgers and claim entailment. This ensures factual accuracy before the agent proceeds to design or execution.

How do I cross-reference vendor documentation with practitioner war stories?

You cross-reference documentation by using adversarial grounding, which deploys parallel lane agents across production, community, and frontier domains to validate constraints and failure modes for complex designs.

What is the best way to scale research depth for fact-checking pipelines?

You can adapt grounding depth by utilizing mode-aware lane fan-out, which automatically scales between quick, standard, and deep research modes based on your specific project requirements.

Can I use automated audit gates to verify claim entailment before execution?

Yes, you can use deterministic gates to enforce strict validation of source ledgers and claim entailment. This automated audit ensures factual accuracy is verified before allowing artifact generation to proceed.

When should I not use adversarial grounding for research validation?

You should avoid adversarial grounding when your project lacks strict ledger schemas or cannot support multi-lane research pipelines, as the deterministic gates require structured inputs to validate factual accuracy properly.