formal-coverage-audit

Formal verification gap analysis scores uncovered state machine and protocol logic paths by impact, exploitability, and remediation effort. It connects implementation code to TLA+, Kani, and proptest artifacts, producing a prioritized backlog of safety and liveness proof gaps.

You need formal verification coverage when preparing high-assurance software for a major release to prevent critical correctness regressions. It validates that critical protocol state machines and parsers are covered by safety and liveness proofs in TLA+ and Kani.

Generate a traceability matrix by running a formal coverage audit on your repository to connect implementation code paths to specific proptest and Kani harnesses. This maps verification artifacts directly to source code for visibility.

Yes, formal verification gap analysis works with Rust codebases and proptest artifacts to audit protocol state machines and parsers. It identifies uncovered paths in Kani harnesses and proptest strategies to harden correctness proofs.

The best way to prioritize formal verification gaps is by scoring them based on security impact, exploitability, and remediation effort. This risk-based scoring highlights critical correctness gaps in TLA+ specs and Kani harnesses for immediate attention.