formalize-informal-proof

Convert informal mathematical proofs into Lean 4 code for formal verification.

3|Updated Feb 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/0bserver07/bourbaki --skill formalize-informal-proof
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: formalize-informal-proof
Source: https://github.com/0bserver07/bourbaki/tree/main/src/skills/formalize-informal-proof
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/0bserver07/bourbaki --skill formalize-informal-proof

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Convert informal mathematical proofs into Lean 4 code, enabling machine-checked correctness.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Convert natural-language or textbook proofs into Lean 4 code for formal verification.
  • Outline the Lean structure, identify required imports, and map informal steps to formal lemmas and tactics.
  • Use cases include math education, research, and rigorous proof development workflows.

Quick Start

Formalize an informal mathematical proof into Lean 4 code for machine-checked verification.

Frequently Asked Questions about formalize-informal-proof

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I convert an informal mathematical proof into Lean 4 code?

To convert an informal mathematical proof into Lean 4 code, you translate natural-language steps into formal lemmas and tactics, selecting required imports and building Lean structures to ensure machine-checked correctness.

What is formal verification for mathematical proofs?

Formal verification is the process of validating mathematical proofs using a proof assistant like Lean 4 to guarantee gap-free, machine-checked correctness for rigorous proof development.

Can I use natural-language textbook proofs for formal verification in Lean?

Yes, you can use natural-language textbook proofs for formal verification by mapping informal steps to formal lemmas and tactics, outlining the Lean structure and identifying required imports.

What's the best way to structure a Lean proof from informal mathematics?

The best way to structure a Lean proof from informal mathematics is to outline the Lean structure first, identify necessary imports, then systematically map informal proof steps to formal lemmas and tactics.

Do I need to specify imports when formalizing proofs in Lean 4?

Yes, specifying imports is required when formalizing proofs in Lean 4 to load necessary mathematical structures and lemmas for validating the complete, gap-free proof.

Why does my informal proof fail formal verification in Lean?

An informal proof may fail formal verification in Lean if there are logical gaps in the informal steps, missing imports, or incorrect mapping to formal Lean lemmas and tactics during the translation process.