fp-check

Verify security bug claims by automating rigorous, evidence-backed verdicts. This process systematically validates reported vulnerabilities across codebases, audits, and CI pipelines to eliminate false positives and provide definitive proof for each finding.

Data-flow analysis maps trust boundaries and traces untrusted inputs to potential vulnerabilities. It provides structured evidence templates for attacker control and proof of concept documentation, ensuring gate-review readiness for security audits.

Generate proof of concept sketches by following standard verification steps that include exploitability proof and impact assessment. This approach validates the vulnerability claim by documenting attacker control and tracing data flow.

Yes, automated security verification supports CI pipelines by issuing gate-reviewed verdicts. It follows standard verification steps and generates evidence templates to ensure only validated security bugs block the pipeline.

Conduct a devil's advocate review by restating the claim and challenging the exploitability proof during deep verification. This structured approach assesses actual impact and eliminates false positives before issuing a final gate-reviewed verdict.

No dependency setup is required to trace trust boundaries. The verification process operates directly on the provided codebase or audit reports to map data flow and generate evidence-backed verdicts.