frame

Clarify product assumptions in feature intake artifacts with framing tables.

1|Updated May 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/edonghyun/donghyuns-agent-tools --skill frame-edonghyun
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: frame
Source: https://github.com/edonghyun/donghyuns-agent-tools/tree/main/plugins/feature-intake/skills/frame
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/edonghyun/donghyuns-agent-tools --skill frame-edonghyun

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill turns an unclear feature artifact into a structured product framing that makes assumptions, users, placement, quality expectations, and risks explicit.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Actor framing: Identifies who operates the feature, who receives the output, and who reviews or supports it.
  • Placement and output framing: Clarifies where the feature lives in the product and what form the result takes.
  • Quality, MVP, and risk analysis: Separates what is known from what is assumed, what can ship now, and what needs follow-up.
  • Use case: Use it when a prototype, PoC, or feature draft needs product context before design, implementation, or approval.

Quick Start

Ask the skill to frame the attached feature artifact and write the product-framing and user-roles notes for the matching docs/feature-intake/<slug>/analysis folder.

Frequently Asked Questions about frame

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I clarify product assumptions for an unclear feature artifact?

You clarify product assumptions for an unclear feature artifact by applying structured framing tables that separate user roles, workflow placement, quality bars, and MVP boundaries. This process makes implicit assumptions explicit using Known, Assumed, Unknown, and Decision Needed labels.

What is feature framing and when do I need it for MVP scope analysis?

Feature framing structures an unclear feature draft by identifying actors, placement, and risks to define MVP scope. You need it when a prototype or feature draft lacks product context before design, implementation, or approval, ensuring operational fit and quality expectations are explicit.

How do I structure user roles and risk analysis for a feature intake document?

Structure user roles and risk analysis by separating who operates the feature, who receives the output, and who reviews it. Apply framing tables with evidence to label risks and assumptions as Known, Assumed, Unknown, or Decision Needed for the feature intake artifact.

Can I use product framing to define the MVP boundary for a prototype?

Yes, you can use product framing to define the MVP boundary for a prototype by separating what is known from what is assumed. This framing explicitly identifies what can ship now and what needs follow-up, clarifying the MVP scope and quality bar.

What's the best way to turn a prototype draft into structured product context?

The best way to turn a prototype draft into structured product context is to analyze the artifact for workflow placement, output destination, and data storage. Use explicit role separation and framing tables to make operational fit and risks clear before implementation.