Evaluate external tools and frameworks against Tessera's design principles.
npx skills add https://github.com/lciacci/tessera --skill framework-evaluation
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: framework-evaluation Source: https://github.com/lciacci/tessera/tree/main/skills/framework-evaluation Command: npx skills add https://github.com/lciacci/tessera --skill framework-evaluation
This Skill prevents ad-hoc decisions about external tools, frameworks, libraries, and patterns by providing a repeatable evaluation process grounded in Tessera's design principles.
Use the framework-evaluation skill to assess whether the specified external tool or framework should be adopted by Tessera and produce the corresponding ADR.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Framework evaluation requires evidence-based analysis across maturity, problem-space overlap, integration cost, pattern fit, lock-in, and maintenance risk. This process prevents ad-hoc adoption decisions by grounding the assessment in structured design principles.
An architecture decision record (ADR) for framework selection documents the adoption verdict, concepts to retain, rejected alternatives, and explicit re-evaluation triggers. It provides a repeatable, defensible record of the technology assessment process and its outcomes.
You should re-evaluate a framework adoption decision when explicit re-evaluation triggers occur. The evaluation process requires defining these triggers in the architecture decision record to ensure ongoing technology assessments remain defensible.
To document lock-in risk and integration cost for a technology assessment, analyze the external tool against your system's design principles. Record the findings in an architecture decision record alongside the adoption verdict and maintenance risk analysis.
Yes, you can borrow selected patterns without full adoption. The evaluation process determines whether to adopt a framework fully, borrow specific patterns, run it alongside existing systems, continue independently, or reject it.
Ad-hoc framework selection lacks a repeatable evaluation process, leading to undefensible adoption decisions. It skips evidence-based analysis of maturity, overlap, integration cost, lock-in, and maintenance risk, missing critical architecture decision record documentation.
FoundationForgeCreate and evaluate Architecture Decision Records with structured context and trade-offs.
queen-of-codeMonitor defined conditions and emit structured event records on trigger.
ddaanetGround external research to validate methodologies and design patterns for a topic.
686f6c61Automate SonarQube code quality analysis with Docker and quality gates.
