ftm-council

What problem does it solve?

Multi-AI deliberation council that sends problems to Claude, Codex, and Gemini as equal peers, then loops through rounds of debate until 2-of-3 agree on a decision. Use when the user wants a second (and third) opinion, says "council this", "get other opinions", "what would other AIs think", "debate this", "multi-model", "ftm-council", or wants to cross-check a decision, architecture choice, debugging approach, or any problem where diverse AI perspectives would reduce blind spots. Even if the user just says "I'm not sure about this approach" or "sanity check this", consider invoking the council.

The Protocol

• The Council uses three peers — Claude, Codex, and Gemini — to independently investigate a problem, deliberate through rounds, and converge on a majority verdict (2-of-3) or a synthesized recommendation.
• It supports auto-invocation in automated pipelines, frames the problem, and returns a structured verdict suitable for orchestration and blackboard logging.
• It emphasizes independent research via isolated subagents and a rebuttal process to surface convergence signals and dissent.

Core Features & Use Cases

• Isolated subagents for Claude, Codex, and Gemini to prevent context leakage
• Independent research, structured rebuttals, and staged consensus rounds
• Majority verdict with 2-of-3 agreement or synthesized conclusion after rounds
• Auto-invocation in CI/CD or pipeline environments for sanity checks and cross-model validation
• Output includes a formal verdict, alignment notes, and blackboard updates for traceability

Quick Start

Frame a council problem and request a 2-of-3 majority verdict after independent rounds.