fulcra-content-review

Review human-facing prose for AI tells, voice match, and claim accuracy before publication.

10|1|Updated May 21, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ashfulcra/fulcra-tools --skill fulcra-content-review-ashfulcra
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: fulcra-content-review
Source: https://github.com/ashfulcra/fulcra-tools/tree/main/skills/fulcra-content-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ashfulcra/fulcra-tools --skill fulcra-content-review-ashfulcra

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve? Drafts written or edited by AI often ship with detectable machine-writing tics, inflated claims, and a voice that does not match the human author whose name goes on them. This Skill provides a measured, repeatable review protocol that catches those problems before content ships. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Measured AI-tell sweep: Run scripts/tic-count.py to count em-dashes, antithesis patterns, ceremony phrases, and other tells per 100 words, with concrete thresholds from a real 8,742-word draft. - Claims discipline and voice matching: Verify every number and capability claim against evidence, and calibrate rewrites against verbatim samples of the real author's diction. - Parallel multi-lane review protocol: Freeze a pinned draft, fan out to independent reviewers across technical, structural, security, and voice lanes, then reconcile findings with a tracking note. - Use Case: Before publishing a proposal or blog post drafted with AI assistance, run the tic-count script, audit every statistic against its source, and produce before/after rewrites of the five worst passages in the owner's voice. ## Quick Start Review the attached draft of my announcement post for AI-writing tells, unsupported claims, and voice drift, then give me the five worst passages rewritten in my voice.

Frequently Asked Questions about fulcra-content-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I check if my writing sounds AI-generated?

Run the tic-count.py script on your draft to count common AI tells like em-dashes per 100 words, "rather than" usage, and ceremony phrases. Compare the counts against the thresholds in the review table, then rewrite the densest passages rather than sanding everything flat.

How to match an author's voice when editing their draft?

Collect 5-10 verbatim quotes from the author's informal messages and match diction, sentence length, and stance. Produce before/after rewrite pairs instead of abstract diagnoses, and test by reading a rewritten paragraph next to a real quote to see if the rhythm gives it away.

What is a parallel multi-lane content review?

It is a protocol where a draft is frozen at a pinned copy, then independent reviewers work separate lanes: technical claims, structure, security risk, and voice. Overlapping findings are treated as signal, and a reconciliation note maps every finding to applied, resolved, or declined.

Does the tic-count script work on Markdown and HTML files?

Yes, tic-count.py accepts HTML, Markdown, and plain text files. It strips tags and Markdown syntax before counting words and patterns, and it always exits with code 0 since it is a meter, not a gate.

When should corrections stay visible in a published document?

That is the owner's call, not the reviewer's. Visible corrections build credibility through shown work, while silent fixes produce a clean design; the review protocol requires asking the owner rather than defaulting to either presentation.