full-cycle-fast

Automate Analyze, Plan, Build, Test, and Ship workflows for small code changes.

6|Updated Mar 18, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/anotherben/claude-harness --skill full-cycle-fast
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: full-cycle-fast
Source: https://github.com/anotherben/claude-harness/tree/main/skills/full-cycle-fast
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/anotherben/claude-harness --skill full-cycle-fast

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Small feature work and quick fixes often suffer from ceremony overhead. This skill delivers a lightweight, end-to-end workflow that keeps structure without slowing down delivery.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Lightweight, end-to-end workflow from analysis to ship.
  • No mandatory research or review gates; ideal for bug fixes, small features, and config changes that follow existing patterns.
  • Use Case: When you have 3-10 file changes with clear requirements and need a predictable path to deployment.

Quick Start

Invoke the /full-cycle-fast workflow with a task description to begin the cycle.

Frequently Asked Questions about full-cycle-fast

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate a lightweight development workflow for small feature work?

Automate a lightweight development workflow by running an Analyze, Plan, Build, Test, and Ship sequence. This process applies to small feature work like 3-10 file changes, bug fixes, and config updates, delivering changes quickly without ceremony overhead.

What is the best workflow for shipping small code changes without ceremony overhead?

The best workflow for shipping small code changes without ceremony overhead is a minimal end-to-end sequence that skips mandatory research or review gates. It provides a predictable path to deployment for 3-10 file changes that follow existing patterns.

Can I use a full development pipeline for simple bug fixes and config updates?

You can use a full development pipeline for simple bug fixes and config updates, but it is often overkill. A minimal workflow provides the necessary structure through an Analyze to Ship sequence without slowing down delivery for 3-10 file changes.

How do I start the build and test cycle for a quick code change?

Start the build and test cycle by invoking the workflow with a task description. This triggers the automated Analyze, Plan, Build, Test, and Ship sequence to handle your quick code changes end-to-end with minimal ceremony.

When should I avoid using a minimal workflow for development?

You should avoid using a minimal workflow when your task requires extensive research or mandatory review agents. This approach is designed for clear requirements and 3-10 file changes, making it unsuitable for complex features needing full pipeline gates.