full-review

Audit a codebase against five software engineering KPIs and generate docs/review.md.

1|Updated Mar 2, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sjev/robodev --skill full-review-sjev
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: full-review
Source: https://github.com/sjev/robodev/tree/main/skills/full-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sjev/robodev --skill full-review-sjev

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes assets (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill automates the comprehensive auditing of an entire codebase, providing a structured, objective assessment of its quality and maintainability.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Codebase Auditing: Analyzes code against five key software engineering KPIs: Maintainability, Extensibility, Testability, Robustness, and Clarity.
  • Objective Scoring: Assigns a score (0-10) for each KPI, highlighting specific strengths and weaknesses with actionable feedback.
  • Use Case: A lead engineer can use this Skill to perform a quarterly audit of a critical microservice, identifying areas for refactoring and ensuring adherence to architectural standards before a major release.

Quick Start

Run the full review skill to audit the codebase and generate docs/review.md.

Frequently Asked Questions about full-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I audit a codebase for maintainability and robustness?

A codebase audit evaluates source code against five software engineering KPIs: Maintainability, Extensibility, Testability, Robustness, and Clarity. It objectively scores each area from 0-10 and provides actionable feedback with specific file and function references in a generated report.

How do I score code testability and extensibility automatically?

Scoring code testability and extensibility involves auditing the codebase against five key software engineering KPIs. The automated assessment assigns a 0-10 score for each metric, identifying specific architectural strengths and weaknesses with actionable feedback.

Can I generate an automated code review report for architectural compliance?

Generating an automated code review report for architectural compliance involves auditing the codebase against five engineering KPIs. The process outputs a detailed markdown file containing objective 0-10 scores and specific, actionable feedback for each evaluated metric.

What is the best way to perform a quarterly code quality audit?

Performing a quarterly code quality audit is best achieved by automating a comprehensive codebase assessment against five software engineering KPIs. This ensures objective scoring across maintainability and robustness, generating a detailed report for periodic quality assurance.

How do I get specific file references when checking code clarity and robustness?

Getting specific file references when checking code clarity and robustness requires an automated codebase audit. The generated report includes specific file and function references alongside actionable feedback, providing targeted areas for codebase refactoring.