fusion-refactor

Compare code refactoring strategies in isolated worktrees by risk, test impact, and migration cost.

Updated Aug 27, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/rdfitted/Claude-Code-Setup --skill fusion-refactor
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: fusion-refactor
Source: https://github.com/rdfitted/Claude-Code-Setup/tree/main/.codex/skills/fusion-refactor
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rdfitted/Claude-Code-Setup --skill fusion-refactor

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the complexity and risk associated with refactoring code by providing a structured way to compare multiple refactoring strategies and select the safest one.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Strategy Refactoring: Explores different refactoring approaches concurrently.
  • Risk Assessment: Compares strategies based on risk, test impact, and migration cost.
  • Use Case: When faced with a large, complex module that needs refactoring, this Skill can generate three distinct refactoring plans (e.g., incremental, module-by-module, large rewrite) and help you choose the one with the lowest risk and disruption.

Quick Start

Use the fusion-refactor skill to compare refactoring approaches for the current codebase, focusing on minimizing risk.

Frequently Asked Questions about fusion-refactor

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I compare refactoring strategies to find the safest code migration path?

You can compare refactoring strategies by orchestrating parallel worker threads in isolated git worktrees to evaluate risk, test impact, and migration cost concurrently.

What is the safest way to refactor a large, complex module?

The safest way to refactor a large module is to generate distinct plans like incremental, module-by-module, or large rewrite, and compare their risk and disruption levels before implementation.

How does parallel worktree refactoring work for risk assessment?

Parallel worktree refactoring works by spawning concurrent worker threads, each exploring a different refactoring approach in an isolated git worktree, culminating in a comparative risk analysis.

Can I evaluate incremental refactoring versus a full rewrite using git worktrees?

Yes, you can evaluate incremental refactoring against a full rewrite by assigning each strategy to a separate isolated git worktree and comparing their respective migration costs and test impacts.

Do I need mprocs to run parallel code refactoring tasks?

Using mprocs is suitable for orchestrating parallel code refactoring tasks, allowing you to manage multiple worker threads exploring different strategies simultaneously within isolated environments.